Tuesday, 09 August 2011
-

Currently
Bloodsucking Fiends: A Love Story
By Christopher Moore
see relatedTop 10 Things Texas Gov. Rick Perry Doesn’t Want You To Know About Him
With widespread discontent on the right over their current presidential field, all eyes are trained on a likely new entrant: Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R).Perry, who has been elected governor three times and served for more than 10 years, enjoys bona fides from social conservatives and Tea Party-types alike. Glenn Beck even described Perry as a man he was so enamored with that he wanted to “French kiss.”
However, as conservatives fawn over their newest presidential hopeful, it’s worth taking a closer examination at his record as governor. On issues across the board, from Perry’s support for dropping out of Social Security and Medicaid to his state’s abysmal pollution levels and his proposal that Texas secede from the United States, the Republican governor has amassed a record of far-right extremism.
ThinkProgress has assembled the top ten hits from Perry’s tenure as governor:
(1) PERRY ALLOWED THE EXECUTION OF A LIKELY INNOCENT MAN, THEN IMPEDED AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE MATTER: In 2004, Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in Huntsville, Texas after being convicted of arson and the murder of his three children. Even after significant evidence emerged showing that arson had not caused the fire (thus exonerating Willingham), Perry refused to grant a stay of execution. Five years after Willingham was executed, a report from a Texas Forensic Science Commission investigator found that the fire could not have been arson. As the commission prepared to hear testimony from the investigator in October 2009, Perry quickly fired and replaced three of its members, forcing an indefinite delay in the hearing.
(2) PERRY WANTS TO REPEAL THE 16th AND 17th AMENDMENTS, ENDING DIRECT ELECTION OF U.S. SENATORS AND THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX: In his 2010 book Fed Up!, Perry called the 16th and 17th Amendments “mistaken” and said they resulted from “a fit of populist rage.” The 16th Amendment allows the federal government to collect income taxes, which is the single biggest source of revenue, accounting for 45 percent of all receipts. The 17th Amendment took electing U.S. senators out of the hands of political insiders and allowed the American public to decide their representation instead. If Perry had his way, the federal government would be stripped of its current ability to fund highway construction projects, food inspectors, and the military, and the American public would not even be permitted to elect their own senators.
(3) PERRY PROPOSED LETTING STATES DROP OUT OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICAID: Despite the programs’ importance and popularity, Perry has argued that states like Texas should be allowed to opt out of Social Security and Medicaid. Were Perry to have his way on Social Security, “the entire system would collapse under the weight of too many Social Security beneficiaries who had not paid into the system,” notes Ian Millhiser. On Medicaid, in addition to stripping 3.6 million low-income Texans of their health care, Perry’s proposal would actually hurt, not help, the state’s budget deficit. This is because, as Igor Volsky writes, opting out of Medicaid would take “billions out of the state economy that goes on to support hospitals and other providers,” while forcing hospitals “to swallow the costs of caring for uninsured individuals who will continue to use the emergency room as their primary source of care.”
(4) TEXAS IS THE COUNTRY’S BIGGEST POLLUTER, BUT PERRY SUED THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR DISAPPROVING OF THE STATE’S AIR QUALITY STANDARDS: Texas is the biggest polluter in the country, leading the nation in carbon dioxide emissions. However, when the EPA published its “disapproval” of the state’s air quality standards for falling short of the Clean Air Act’s requirements, Perry sued the federal government to challenge the ruling. Perry’s environmental record doesn’t end there. He is a global warming denier who called the 2010 BP oil spill an “act of God” while speaking at a trade association funded by BP.
(5) PERRY DESIGNATED AS “EMERGENCY LEGISLATION” A BILL REQUIRING ALL WOMEN SEEKING ABORTIONS TO HAVE SONOGRAMS FIRST: In January, Perry proposed requiring all women seeking abortions to have a sonogram at least 24 hours before the procedure. Under the bill, doctors would be required to “tell a woman the size of her fetus’ limbs and organs, even if she does not want to know.” Before a woman is permitted to have an abortion, physicians are also forced to provide an image of the fetus and make the woman listen to the sound of its heartbeat. Perry designated his proposal as “emergency legislation,” allowing the bill to be rushed through the legislature. He signed it into law last month.
(6) PERRY GUTTED CHILDCARE SERVICES EVEN AS TEXAS CHILDHOOD POVERTY HIT 25 PERCENT: Facing a $27 billion budget deficit this year, Perry decided to gut child support services, despite a report from the Center for Public Policy Priorities that found nearly one in four Texas children lived beneath the poverty line. Instead of raising revenue like California, a state facing a similarly sized deficit, Perry scaled back more than $10 billion of child support over two years. As Think Progress’ Pat Garofalo noted, these cuts were proposed despite Texas’ possession of a $8.2 billion rainy day fund.
(7) PERRY WAS A STRONG SUPPORTER OF TEXAS’S ANTI-SODOMY LAWS: Perry was a strong proponent of Texas’s anti-sodomy law that was struck down in 2003 by the Supreme Court in Lawrence v. Texas. Calling the law “appropriate,” Perry dismissed the Court decision as the result of “nine oligarchs in robes.” Even after being struck down, Perry supported the Texas legislature’s refusal to remove the law from its books.
(8) PERRY IS A STIMULUS HYPOCRITE WHO LOUDLY CRITICIZED FEDERAL RECOVERY MONEY BUT USED IT TO BALANCE HIS STATE’S BUDGET: As the nation struggled to avoid economic collapse in 2009, Perry was a vocal critic of Congress’s recovery package, even advocating that Texas reject the money because “we can take care of ourselves.” Months later, after Perry was able to balance the state’s budget only with the aid of billions in federal stimulus dollars, Perry again repeated that he would reject federal funding, arguing that the government “spends money they don’t have.” Five months later, Perry again took advantage of federal funding to issue $2 billion in bonds for highway improvements in Texas. Even so, the state faces a $27 billion budget deficit.
(9) PERRY SAID THAT TEXAS MIGHT HAVE TO SECEDE FROM THE UNITED STATES: One hundred and fifty years ago, Texas and other southern states seceded from the Union, resulting in a bloody Civil War. 148 years later, Perry floated the idea that Texas may again have to secede because of a federal government that “continues to thumb their nose at the American people.” Perry was roundly criticized for his proposal, yet he repeated his threat the next month on Fox News, telling host Neil Cavuto, “If Washington continues to force these programs on the states, if Washington continues to disregard the tenth amendment, who knows what happens.”
(10) DESPITE HAVING THE WORST UNINSURED RATE IN THE COUNTRY, PERRY CLAIMS THAT TEXAS HAS “THE BEST HEALTH CARE IN THE COUNTRY” : On Bill Bennett’s radio show last year, Perry claimed that “Texas has the best health care in the country.” In reality, Texas has the highest rate of uninsured residents of any state. More than one in four Texans lack coverage; the national average is just 15.4 percent. As such, there are more uninsured residents in Texas than there are people in 33 states. Despite Texas’s low coverage rates, the state has some of the most restrictive Medicaid eligibility thresholds, and Perry has even proposed dropping out of the program. Texas also has an inordinately high percentage of impoverished children, yet Perry opposed expanding the successful State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).
Thanks to Think Progress for this.
Post a Comment
- Back to GodlessLiberal's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in GodlessLiberal's local time zone: GMT -06:00 (Central Standard - US, Canada)





Comments (57)
When people on the left started to criticize Sarah Palin, I said "Don't worry about Sarah Palin. She is not a serious candidate." When people on the left started to criticize Donald Trump, I said "Don't worry about Donald Trump. He is not a serious candidate." When people on the left criticized Michelle Bachmann, I said "Don't worry about Michelle Bachmann. She is not a serous candidate."
Now Gov. Rick Perry, you might want to start worrying. Elected three times as Governor with actual executive experience and a pretty good track record of bringing good jobs into Texas with a specific plan to do so, I tend to think he will destroy Obama in a general election. It won't even be close. He is the only Republican so far I can say that about and nothing you just said in this post will hurt him in the general election. They will be talking points but people will throw that out the window for a candidate that can do something about the economy.
In regards to #10. So does Texas have the best healthcare because every doctor in Texas can focus on that one person who can pay for their services, and doesn't have to deal with all those uninsured folks?
Perry scares me. That's just... all there is to it.
@TheTheologiansCafe - Don't you think that #8 and #9 show that Perry won't actually be able to do something about the economy?
@opticalnoise - I think that number 9 just gained him almost every state in the South.
I just don't think those kind of anti-government statements hurt him. Plus he has experience in leadership. I really think that if he had run in 2008, President Obama would never had won. President Obama went against a fairly weak candidate last time. But now with the economy struggling so much and the basic indication that he is not sure what to do about it, I am not sure he has a real chance against any serious candidate. By the way, I consider Gov Perry the only serious candidate on the Republican side and I think that the left should start to attack him. But I am not sure that is going to work. All of these points will be trumped by a really weak economy with no perception that there is a plan to work out of it.
ayi yiyiyi what a mess.
@TheTheologiansCafe - I am terrified for the state of our nation.
@opticalnoise - So are most of the voters so they will go for someone that they think will add stability and fix the problems. I am not sure how old you are but this sort of reminds me of the 1980 election when the economy was horrible. President Carter was the nicest man on the planet. Everyone knew that. Reagan was elected because people thought he had the leadership to change things. Carter was elected when people were cynical (I was too young for Carter's election). Reagan was elected when people were realist. I was only 9 when Reagan was elected but I do remember how huge of an issue the economy was at that time. The 2012 election in my opinion will be decided on one issue. Who can fix the economy?
@TheTheologiansCafe - I'm only 23 (born in 88) but I'm not disagreeing with your political analysis, and that's why I'm terrified...I'm smart enough to read the writing on the wall and see that we are probably in for more of this Tea Party nonsense that will set the nation back decades in terms of civil rights, cause our credit rating to drop even further (and not just on S&P's list) and potentially make murder condonable. It makes me sick and sad and scared.
I always find it kind of ironic that conservatives like Perry do not want big government involvement (like income taxes). But they want to be able to tell people who they can and cannot have sex with.
The only reason I would want to see him win is so that he can use his favorite line to bid Obama farewell.
I like his hat. Can't hold that one against him.
jump on it. good for you.
It seems like he enjoys being willfully ignorant of the world around him.
@AmeliaHart - so true. republicans are not any more "small government" than democrats. Democrats want the government to be involved in your economic life but stay out of your social life. The majority of the republican party wants the opposite. It's not small government vs. big government, it's where you do and don't want government interference that determines party affiliation.
telling someone not just who they can have sex with but HOW (sodomy is any non-procreative sex, regardless of the gender of participants) is big government
The social security and medicaid systems are already collapsing from too many beneficiaries who haven't paid into the system. It's absurd to believe that allowing people to opt out of it changes anything except the speed at which the inevitable happens.
@jenessa1889 - Yes. I think there is also something on sex toys as well. It's really none of their damn business.
@AmeliaHart - yup, there are quite a few states where a sex toy can only be sold if marketed as a joke/novelty gift. if it's market as an actual aid in sex it's illegal. how is that not labelled as some Orwellian, big brother, bullshit?
just goes to show that calling it "big brother" when the government wants to regulate business is a scare tactic, not a legitimate concern
@jenessa1889 - Bam! That's a very succint observation! While I kinda knew that already, I had never quite thought of it in such an articulate manner. Awesome.
Senators were not selected by "political insiders" prior to the 17th Amendment. They were selected by the state legislatures and approved by Governors. The purpose was to send somebody to represent the state's interests in the federal government. It was a better way to insure that State's interests were being looked after in Washington.
Medicare and Medicaid are Ponzi Schemes. They are doomed to collapse. The Federal Government is no better than Bernie Madoff or Charles Ponzi with this scam.
The EPA is a bureaucratic nightmare. Their purpose is to regulate the things that Congress is too cowardly to pass legislatively. Why shouldn't their rulings be challenged? "Global Warming" is a farce. It's been proven to be a farce. Didn't Al Gore spend $10,000,000 on a beachfront home he claimed would be below sea level in 10 years? Maybe it's time to wake up and smell the fear mongering for what it is.
What's wrong with a woman knowing the status of the fetus before an abortion? A patient should know everything about a procedure before surgery. Are you concerned that a life might be saved?
Federal money was taxed from Texas, why shouldn't those funds be returned? More dollars left Texas than were returned. The Texas budget would have been balanced without the stimulus funds if the taxes hadn't been confiscated.
Gee, Perry didn't emulate California? Might be a reason why Texas has a good economy and California is failing.
If the election were held today, between Perry and Obama, I'd vote for Perry as swiftly as an SEIU or ACORN member would vote for Obama twice.
All too glad to be Canadian right at this moment.
evangelical Reverend Hagee has and does claim that in murdering 6 million Jews Hitler was doing god's work. Perry has had a relationship with Hagee and is fully aware of this opinion and yet still invited Hagee to the Christian only prayer meeting this past Saturday. if that doesn't tell people Perry's not playing with a full deck nothing will. although we're seeing a lot of press about the Bible Belt's far right evangelicals and the Tea Party these days, according to polls most people in the U.S. view them negatively. i have more faith in the American people as a whole that Perry won't stand a chance in hell once he has to venture out of the far right world and try to convince the rest of us he's rational. he's got way too many skeletons in his closet.
Ain't nothing scarier than the Top Ten Things We Already Know About Obama
*and* he's riding on the idiot's coattails, trying to get in. President Obama FTW!
@BB61 - No one goes into an abortion without having tried to explore all other possible options. I know this is a generalization, but, honestly, girls/women don't think, "Damn, I got pregnant. Guess I should just boot this baby out." The decision to have an abortion is a very difficult, drawn-out one. Trying to guilt someone to change their minds, to introduce indecision on something they have already angsted over, is just not okay. Making them listen to the fetus's HEARTBEAT is not "necessary information." Letting them know what the fetus's weight, what limbs and everything are there, are not necessary to the decision they make.
And sometimes, performing an abortion DOES save a life. There are cases where the fetus is a danger to the pregnant woman who is carrying it, and the fetus MUST be aborted for the woman to live, or else it is quite possible that BOTH the woman and the fetus will die.
I'm really uncomfortable with abortion. I honestly think people should try to find another option. But I refuse to infringe on someone else's reproductive rights.