Friday, 19 August 2011

  • Currently
    Endgame
    By Rise Against
    see related

    Be afraid. Be very fucking afraid.

    Just when we’d finally stopped tearing our hair out over the fact that Sarah Palin could actually be a presidential candidate, into her Ferragamos (though apparently not without suffering for it) steps Michele Bachmann. Not just, as less than 5,000 Iowans have now ensured, a serious contender for the Republican presidential nomination, but a leading contender.

    michele-bachmann-crazy-president

    I usually think of myself as a cynic. A cynic who believes that approximately half the American populace is insane. And yet . . . and yet . . . every once in a while they still manage to surprise me. They did it in 2004 (though that was not so much a surprise as a heartwrenchingly depressing dose of reality). They did it in 2008 when Sarah Palin was not immediately laughed off as the most ridiculous vice presidential candidate in history. And now, yet again, I realize I’ve underestimated the stupidity of the American populace. Because as much as I chided friends on Facebook for being “amazed” that Bachmann won in Iowa and “in disbelief” that she wants to repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (I mean, come on. This would be the mildest of the anti-gay legislation she’d put on the table, I assure you.), wasn’t there something inside me that was, still, in 2011, utterly incredulous that this was actually happening? That part of my gut whose immediate reaction was “Really? Really? Has it really come to this?”


    Bachmann’s ascension and candidacy are terrifying for a multitude of reasons, some of which are outlined in this week’s
    New Yorker profile by Ryan Lizza. I encourage you to read every last cringe-inducing word about her “education” (read “religious indoctrination”) at the hands of some of the country’s most radical—and slavery-condoning—“theologians.” You know, the kind who write things like When people curse their parents, it is clearly a capital crime (Exodus 21:17). The son or daughter is under the lawful jurisdiction of the family. The integrity of the family must be maintained by the threat of death. Because, of course, we're pro-life. The kind of people who, like Bachmann, get their law degrees at Oral Roberts University, whose founding twin goals were to equip our students with the ability to bring God's healing power to reconcile individuals and to restore community wholeness and to restore law to its historic roots in the Bible. If you want, you can delve even deeper into the nitty gritty fanaticism of the aptly-named Dominionists by reading the words of the son of one of said theologians himself.

    images

    But I digress. What's got me particularly riled today is actually the effect of Bachmann's candidacy on women and their future as one-half of this country.


    You see, good feminist that I am, I judge women exactly the same as I judge men. Hillary, Sarah, Michele—you don’t score extra points with me just because you’ve got a vagina. It’s infinitely more significant to me that you are a (choose one) lying manipulative hack / raging idiot / certifiably lunatic religious fanatic. So when I first heard, back in May, that New Jersey
    high school sophomore Amy Myers had challenged Michele Bachmann to a “Public Forum Debate and/or Fact Test on The Constitution of the United States, United States History and United States Civics,” I thought “Good for her! This woman’s knowledge and interpretation of American history are just embarrassing. She totally needs to be taken down. And by a teenager. Go, girl!”

    What had not yet occurred to me, however, was the impact the kinds of things Bachmann was saying could have, and was already having, on young people—specifically on their views of women leaders.


    In her letter to Bachmann, Myers wrote: “As one of a handful of women in Congress, you hold a distinct privilege and responsibility to better represent your gender nationally. The statements you make help to serve an injustice to not only the position of Congresswoman, but women everywhere. Though politically expedient, incorrect comments cast a shadow on your person and by unfortunate proxy, both your supporters and detractors alike often generalize this shadow to women as a whole.”


    Now, that is one eloquent teenager. Who is, unfortunately, dead on. It hit me hardest when, in
    a subsequent interview, Myers characterized Bachmann’s frequent misstatements as an embarrassment to all women with political ambitions, making it harder for them to be taken seriously in politics. It took until the 19th amendment for women to be able to vote, and now it seems like the most famous women in politics are kind of jokes.

    It seems like at school there's always a separation between what people think men can do and what women can do, Myers said. If a girl says she wants to go into politics, people say 'Oh yeah, like Michele Bachmann?'

    When I read that, it just about broke my heart.


    Really? Really? Has it really come to this?


    michele-bachmann-crazy

    Is this really where we are at now in this country? Have we come this far to have our hard-won accomplishments (meager though they often may seem) nullified by fucktards just because those fucktards are women? Just because there are enough other fucktards around to vote them into public office?
    And yes, I say OUR hard-won accomplishments because I believe women's rights are human rights, and when women as a group are impoverished, we as a society are impoverished.

    And all this is without even mentioning her frightening stance on the truly critical issues affecting women's rights in this country
    which is of course dictated by her religious beliefs. Who was made out of whose rib? Who was given dominion over the earth and all the other living creatures on it? You got it, ladies.

    I’m not sure how much worse it has to get before the sane people in this country realize we’re in fucking serious trouble and whatever you think you’re doing to fight against it, well, it ain’t bloody good enough, now, is it?


    I find it hard to believe it would be possible to organize our way out of the mess this country is in. A lot of us had hope in 2008. (And I say hope, not crazy-ass expectations that Obama was the second coming and was going to fix all the fucked-up shit and everything would be better forever. Puh-lease.) Where's that hope now? Hope has left the building, motherfuckers. And more and more, I’m starting to think we sane folks should just leave the goddamned country and watch the crumbling of this empire from afar instead of continuing to clutch our front-row-seat tickets to the apocalypse in our sweaty little paws.

Comments (108)

  • ShimmerBodyCream

    YOU STRUCK THE FEAR OF GOD INTO ME

  • veronika_grey
  • AlluringAddiction
  • BooduhX3Belly

    I'm not scared, because I know that she won't get elected.
    Republicans are scared, and they have yet to pick somebody who can even compare to Obama. Even though I don't really like him, I think he's going to get re-elected. Simply because he already won a Nobel prize for his potential.
    I was watching Jon Stewart and the political analyst that was on as a guest (I can't remember his goddam name,..) said that Bachman, Perry and Paul Ryan have absolutely no chance. Which is nice to hear because everyone is freaking the hell out.
    Honestly...the Republicans need to pick a moderate if they want any chance of winning. They can't have someone saying "AHHH PRO LIFE MUTHAFUCKAH!" Even though pro-life or pro-choice seem to be really trivial in the long run, I think it'll make a huge difference.
    People are scared of radicals, whether they be radical left or radical right.


    (I'm not even going to touch the feminist part... I'm so sick of women like her and Sarah Palin getting props. If they were smart.... I'd feel a little better about my gender running for President.)

  • girlForgetful
  • maniacsicko

    i'll get the popcorn ready

  • Pink_TeaCups

    It's interesting because I think the population and the media will have more interest in female candidates than any other, since you haven't had a female president yet. And what best to follow Americas first black president then Americas first female president?


    I like that you don't think different towards her because she has a vagina, that's the way it should be. I hope, for your sake, for Americas sake and for well, the worlds sake, that she doesn't win the election. 
    Maybe I'll go bitch crazy on her ass and rip out her hair, Elle style. 
  • Insomnia_Pickles_XtraTomato

    seriously why are all these female politicians so FUCKING INSANE! really! . there are sane, intelligent women out there... there's got to be. i hope? :(

  • my_little_niche
    Im of the opinion that of George bush Jr can be reelected, then anything can happen in this country. Such as Michele bachmann being elected . Which scares the shit out of me.
  • GodlessLiberal

    @Insomnia_Pickles_XtraTomato - There are a few good ones. Hillary Clinton (after she cooled off from the '08 election), Olivia Snowe, Amy Klobuchar... I think part of why the women tend to be extremists (left or right) is because women have to be above and beyond the equivalent male candidate, so they have to do more to stand out to get elected. Just a passing hypothesis, nothing solid to back this up.

  • musterion99

    I’m starting to think we sane folks should just leave the goddamned country

    Yes, then we can truly be a "Christian nation".  

  • DominatingThinspo

    @musterion99 - funny you say that because I am in the long process of doing just that. Possibly Taiwan or the Philippines. I have given up on America the stupid.

  • DominatingThinspo

    Krisko thank you for writing these posts! Keep up the good work.

  • zoetherat

    I don't see how any of the major Republican candidates are any better. Bachman is crazy ideological. Romney is perhaps the biggest cynic who's ever run: a man who went from social liberal to social conservative the minute he became a presidential candidate. And Perry's the guy who accused the Fed of treason, yet suggests succeeding from the union (which actually is treason) when he doesn't agree with America's politics. He seems as much of an ideologue as Bachman. And the remaining candidates simply have no way of winning. I wouldn't have minded McCain (minus Palin) or Huntsman as president. 

  • Colorsofthenight
  • cmdr_keen

    The Iowa Straw Poll has

    always

    ended in a result that allows the candidate who can energize a small section of the community to win it. It's why the more "serious" candidates tend to skip it, as it's not a reliable indicator of how the primaries are going to go.


    It's being blown out of proportion, doubly so because of the appeal and platform Bachamann runs on. If Ron Paul had won, there would have been a collective eye-roll and a "here we go again" mentality. 
    So, before we go all Chicken Little on the situation, lets sit back and just see how things start developing next year when the results of polls/votes/caucuses actually count towards anything.
    Right?
  • The_Aftershock_3650

    Ron Paul is the only sane Republican candidate here (surprisingly enough), but I would still rather Barack Obama be president. Obama should be a better president in his second term than his first.

  • GodlessLiberal

    @The_Aftershock_3650 - You have a very generous definition of "sane." And I'm hoping Obama pulls a Bill Clinton and spends his second term not worrying about getting reelected anymore and actually passing progressive legislation (hopefully without a sex scandal, though).

  • cmdr_keen

    @zoetherat - I think it was John Huntsman's campaign manager who said that in the end the GOP establishment will pick one who is the most centrist and least controversial. He posits that there are two "traditional" GOP candidates: Romney and Huntsman, against the rest (Perry, Bachamann, Cain, Paul etc) who are "non-traditional" and that as long as the Huntsman campaign can get the primaries down to Huntsman vs A N Other (defeating Romney) they'll win the Primary. 


    It's a thought.
    While the whole country is dominated by Bachamann and Perry right now, it's usually because the narrow range of supporters that they attract are being incredibly vocal. Most Independent/non-aligned/Democrat voters are being really quiet which is why although the media perception is showing an almost unstoppable machine in the Bachamann and Perry camps, it's highly unlikely to translate to any tangible electoral success.
    The most likely outcome is Obama being reelected. This election cycle is reminding me more and more of the 2004 cycle in which G W Bush defeated John Kerry despite appearing to have a ton of negatives against him.
  • emily_shannon

    The thought of Bachmann in office completely sickens me. I don't even want to think of the terrors that will befall the gay community, and to know that there are people who defend her just really makes my stomach want to come out my mouth. >< She wins, I'm moving.

  • TheThinkingPerson

    The thought of Michele Bachmann as President genuinely terrifies me. Palin's a religious fanatic just like Bachmann is, but the latter is actually competent-she can get her way, no matter how insane her worldview is.

    Note: If Michele Bachmann is elected and you are Muslim, Gay, or an atheist, it would be a good idea to leave this country by January 20, 2013. I hate to invoke Godwin's Law, but she'd put all three of those groups in extermination camps if she could get away with it.

  • thepsychoticraccoon

    As a young voter a lot of the stuff I've been seeing going on in politics has been discouraging. I call myself an Independent because I don't believe in party lines, but the way things are going right now it's like I HAVE to choose. We can't get out of this mess with just one side or the other... Republicans and Democrats need to grow the fuck up and put on their big boy panties and work together. I don't believe in party lines, but I don't think I can vote for Republican candidates -- maybe if they were more moderate, but a lot of the stuff I've been seeing is so batshit insane and I just can't do it.

  • TheSutraDude

    well said. every now and again i mention i was the only guy in the first ever feminist class at my college. i've been pro equal rights for women since at least as far back as the 3rd grade. this means i will not vote for Bachmann, d'uh. i was even more dumbfounded when Bush was elected for a second term than i was the first time around. for this reason i don't put any level of ignorance past the American people. i was shocked to see how many Americans jumped on the invasion of Iraq bandwagon. years later most people agree it was a horrible decision and most know they were lied to by the Bush administration. how did people not know it at the time? for these and other reasons i cannot feel totally comfortable that Bachmann or Perry will not be elected but i am fairly certain neither will. right now we are seeing support for their monstrous views by a minority of Americans highlighted in the media because this is after all the runup to the GOP primary but the disapproval rating for the tea party has risen and continues to rise as people have become more aware of what they are about. once these wingnut candidates have to face questions from everyone and not just their choirs they are in for trouble. they won't be able to justify or step back enough from statements they have made and continue to make on their present campaign trails. the lies, the inconsistencies, the wacko views are going to be brought into the light of day. still, if we don't actually vote they will actually get elected. there is a concerted effort by republicans to make it more difficult for people they feel will vote against them to vote. we have to be vigilant. we have to not fall into a malaise. we also have to be mindful that people on FOX, conservative talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, and of course these candidates constantly lie and deceive. their belief is the end justifies the means and they will throw anything against the wall knowing it will stick with their followers. here is an example from only just yesterday. there are examples every day: 

    Donald Trump got on TV and stated Obama has taken more vacation days than George W. Bush had by this time in both their presidencies. this is a blatant lie. at this time Obama has taken a few over 70 days. by this time Bush had taken over 180 days. another figure puts Bush's number at over 220 days. how many Americans though do you think saw Trump on TV and now believe Bush took fewer vacation days than Obama? i'm guessing more than a few. this is clear and intentional propaganda within our own country. it's like healthcare reform was going to pull the plug on your grandmother. how many people parroted that lie? know that if you rely on FOX for your information you are statistically and consistently one of the most factually misinformed people in the U.S. 

    a word about Obama. there are things that i am disappointed in, mostly his willingness to compromise to the extent he has thus far, yet in the face of the greatest opposition any recent President has faced (including racism and don't for a minute think that is not one of the undercurrents driving the opposition) Obama has pushed through more legislation in his first term than any other President, ever, legislation like equal pay for equal work for women. against fierce opposition he rescued the American auto industry and if you think that is not huge in this economy, even The Ford Motor Company which did not take a government loan pushed for the other manufacturers to be kept alive by the government. Ford knew industries it relies on would have otherwise weakened or collapsed. 

    healthcare reform. it wasn't pretty. it didn't go far enough in my opinion but it's something nobody has been able to accomplish since Truman tried. Nixon tried and failed. understand too that when the Social Security Act was first passed it was not pretty and was revised and tapered in the years that followed. still, as more pieces of healthcare reform kick in more people are seeing and experiencing the benefits. 

    because Obama cannot wave a magic wand and fix everything himself, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. and don't forget, he was the one who kept his promise and got Bin Laden, the man who was really behind the 9/11 attack. Obama has proposed ideas that are originally republican ideas, at present there is one to reform patent law to make it easier for people who invent things to get the ball rolling. only now because Obama has taken their idea and said ok let's do this they are against it. they will do anything at any cost to the American people to get him out of office. that is their agenda. they've stated it publicly (Mitch McConnell) and have demonstrated it again and again. 

  • tgwiy

    I'm going to stay in Canada thanks.

  • In_Reason_I_Trust

    This bitch is nuttier than squirrel crap at a pistachio factory.

  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)