Friday, 29 June 2012

  • Currently
    A People's History of the World: From the Stone Age to the New Millennium
    By Chris Harman
    see related

    Want to reduce the number of abortions? Here's my plan:

    Step 1: Proper sex education. How many of you had a PROPER sexual education course? I know I did. I still have nightmares about the slideshow. If you had a proper course, you know what I'm talking about. The extreme closeups on ravaged genitalia.
    "What is that? Is that a hippo with gout?"
    "That's gonorrhea."
    "Oh. I'm never touching a woman. Ever."
    Those slideshows always reminded me of what could happen if I had unprotected sex. Even ten years later those images are burned to the backs of my retinas. And for the record, a proper sex education still teaches that abstinence is the best way to prevent pregnancy and STDs. But it should not be the only thing taught.

    Studies show that in the parts of America teaching abstinence only education the average age of first sexual encounter was later and number of sexual partners was lower, but the STD rate stayed the same and pregnancy actually went up, because kids used oral or anal sex as an alternative, and when they had traditional sex it was much more likely to be unprotected.

    Expecting teenagers to just "say no to sex" is incredibly naive. This is when hormones are flowing and every single facet of society tells you to have sex... it's fun and popular. So just saying "abstain" and washing your hands of it is not a solution. Teaching kids about condoms, the pill, and other options are what works. Kids that don't get sex education don't know that you can get STDs from oral sex, or that you can get pregnant even if you do "pull out." So obviously their education is incomplete.

    Part of this sex education will be teaching that pregnancies are a purely biological function, not a horrible stigma upon whatever woman has it. My hypothesis is that part of the reason for getting an abortion is the fear of the shame of being an unwed teenage mother.


    Step 2: Access to contraceptives. All this teaching doesn't do any good if they can't get the things they need for safe sex. This seems fairly self-explanatory. Expecting kids not to have sex because they have no access to condoms is like expecting to reduce the number of fires by removing fire extinguishers.



    Step 3: Financial support for women who DO become pregnant. One of the determining factors in getting an abortion is "can I afford this baby?"
    If they get help with things like medical attention, maternity clothes, leave of absence from their job, a legitimate way to get affordable care for the child while the mother works her job... why, they might not get an abortion. Far too often the "pro-life" crowd seems to cease caring about the life once it is outside the womb.

    Now of course, there will be some concern over people abusing this, and saying "I'm pregnant, give me money." There's a really simple way around that. Give them funding in a way that can only be used towards legitimate enterprises. I obviously don't know the most fool-proof method yet, but some thoughts I've had include:
    • Something like food stamps, but used only towards things like maternity clothes, cribs, diapers, etc.
    • "Pregnancy counselors" or something of the sort that you must go through to buy all these things. You must check in with them every so often for medical checkups and help planning and purchasing.
    • Medical checkups would be required for proof of pregnancy.
    This should be something both sides of the issue can get behind. It doesn't impede on a woman's right to choose, which will make pro-choice people happy, and it decreases the amount of abortions, which makes pro-lifers happy. No plan will ever make either side truly, 100% happy, but I truly think this is about as good as it can get. It pries too much into the social life of the prospective mother for liberals, and it's too socially-conscious for conservatives. But progress often requires compromise, so figure out what's more important to you. Liberals need to realize that government assistance requires some invasion to operate properly, and conservatives need to realize that "just say no" may be fine on a bumper sticker, but effective laws need more thought and money backing them.


Comments (59)

  • Doubledb

    I was in public school and sent through health class, which included sex education (in middle and high school). I think it was beneficial, though we didn't break out condoms in class, but it was informative. And you are right, abstinence and monogamy were strongly encouraged (though not exclusively).

    I have also heard some Christian guys say they were for masturbation (saying it was not a sin), if it kept guys from being promiscuous with women (still not sure if I agree 100%, since as a Christian I think lust is necessary for it). I dont know why people are so scared of information. I think as long as people are getting good information, not skewed, it should be helpful, instead of harmful, in making decision, both morally and ethically.

    As a Christian, I believe in sex after marriage, and at 29 and still single and have stuck with that... but also have stuck by my convictions because I dont want STD's, HIV, AIDS, or to get someone pregnant. I have seen how promiscuity can ruin poeple and relationships. But I didnt really start to think about dating seriously until college. I sometimes wonder if teenagers in middle school are mature enough to date, mostly cause they have so many hormones and changes, I dont think they are wise enough to think and make wise decision when it comes to sex and relationships. I personally didnt feel mature enough for dating and relationships until late high school and early college.

    Also, I am really not for sex education in elementary school, but think it is beneficial in middle and highschool (I had it in 7th and 9th grade,. along with drug education as well in those grades). However, I do think kids in elementry school would do well to have classes about bullying and abuse (Physical,. Emotional, and Sexual).

  • grim_truth
    uh-huh

    Awesomely said!  While I am pro-life, I fully agree here.  The best way to put an end to abortions is to work harder at stopping the unwanted pregnancies in the first place.  Then, it becomes a moot point.  It's pretty common sense, too.  If my kid keeps scribbling on the walls with a sharpie, the best way to keep it from happening is to keep him from getting ahold of the sharpie in the first place.  Then, when he's old enough and ready enough, he may use a sharpie for the right purposes. 

  • Nushirox2

    I will never forget being taught how to apply a condom with a fake blue penis.

    That will stay with me forever.

  • ZombieMom_Speaks

    That's a lot of common sense there, Krisko. Let's hope it spreads.

    We have to start combating 'abstinence only' education. Absolutely have to. Shaming a hormonal teenager into not having sex simply doesn't work; there's just too much going on in their minds and bodies. Even if they think god is watching, statistically they are going to have sex. I completely reject the argument that providing kids with sex ed and access to contraceptives encourages them to have sex. They're already going to do so, may as well make sure they do it safely. This is something I had multiple talks with my oldest son about while he was in his teens and guess what? IT TOOK. He has never had an STD and no young girls have shown up here to tell me, "John got me pregnant". I also made it clear to him that accidents do occur and while we should always take precautions to prevent being placed in a situation we're not ready to live with, if the unexpected does happen I'll be there to help in every way I can. Given the information he needed, he has acted responsibly. Kids can most certainly be trusted to do this.

    You can tell teens it's a sin and god is watching (and judging), you can try to shame or scare them into abstaining, but eventually the call of biology will trump their fear of a higher power. If that happens and they don't know how to protect themselves, the blame is partly on the parents for neglecting to educate them when they end up pregnant or infected with an STD.

  • jrmaxwell

    We had sex education when I was in school decades ago. Of course, it was mainly what information was scrawled on the bathroom stalls.


    Abstinence always works unless one forgets to remain in the abstaining mode. The Rythmn method always works unless you miss a beat. I think god may have had one of those John Roberts dilemmas - should he continue in the be fruitful and multiply mode or have a commandment to use condums? That is truly a god conundrum.


    We must never forget that girls get pregnant so they can be welfare queens, and boys never are involved in that equation.


    'Nuff said. I have to get on to my daily mantra - we are effed, we are so effed!

  • Kellsbella

    I'm getting the giggles because I'm thinking on that principal that was reprimanded for teaching children about oral sex in a sex education class. The class I had to take in the 6th grade was very fundamental. (In other words, I had to learn to give head on my own.) This brings up an interesting point to ponder....how much education aught to be taught in school and how much at home?

    While I agree with you about education, I have a bit more trouble with the hand-out programs.....

  • GodlessLiberal

    @Kellsbella - In my high school, since they had no way to get condoms other than the local Walgreens, kids were either too embarrassed to buy them (thus not using them) or ended up stealing them.

  • agnophilo

    Conservative politics is all emotion and no logic.

  • agnophilo

    @GodlessLiberal - Imagine how this must be in a small town where the pharmacist knows your dad.

  • AmyDoo

    In general, I've heard that teen pregnancy rates have stayed steady for many years despite education. I'm convinced that the problem with teen pregnancy is not a lack of education, but the superman syndrome associated with adolescents and teenagers; they all think it won't happen to me. Last year I had a student that had TWO babies, I mean, how does that even happen? I had another student who had gotten two girls pregnant at the same time. It is so sad, and I wish we could find the answer.

  • UTRow1

    @AmyDoo - Actually, teenage pregnancy and abortion rates have been pretty steadily decreasing since the federal government became more involved in sex ed in the mid-1980's. Report: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends.pdf

    From the report:

    -In 2005, the U.S. teenage pregnancy rate reached its lowest point in more than 30 years (69.5), down 41% since its peak in 1990 (116.9). However, in 2006, the rate increased for the first time in more than a decade, rising 3%.  
    -From 1986 to 2006, the proportion of teenage pregnancies ending in abortion declined almost one-third, from 46% to 32% of pregnancies among 15–19-year-olds.

    Conservatives like to use the abortion issue to paint a picture of moral decay in our society, often as part of a strategy to promote regressive social policies. Fortunately, most of their concerns are often fabricated full cloth by politicians for political gain. We are doing OK with regards to abortion, and most of the evidence indicates the increasing availability of contraceptives and increased funding of sex ed are responsible.

  • laytexduckie

    Far too often the "pro-life" crowd seems to cease caring about the life once it is outside the womb."



    Ain't that the truth. Funny thing was I was rewatching George Carlin's "Back In Town" last night. And just to reconfirm:

    "If you're pre-born, you're fine. If you're preschool, you're fucked."
  • flapper_femme_fatale
  • BenelliMan

    I've learned in the Army that ANYTHING and EVERYTHING that makes too much sense is a no-go for Americans.

  • nerdyveggiegirl

    YOU once said you're not touching a woman? Who is this and what have you done with my boyfriend? *eyes you suspiciously*

    I don't understand why people would be against sex education. When my kiddo's older, I want her to have all the tools she can to protect herself, and to understand the risks involved with unprotected sex. Communication should be open and age appropriate. The last thing I want is to her to contract an infection because she wasn't taught the importance of protecting herself.

  • MiDarkLyfe
    uh-huh

    Great post! Finding common ground between Pro-Life and Pro-Choice is next to impossible, but you've found some good places to get started.

  • Kellsbella

    @agnophilo - @GodlessLiberal - Um, imagine our embarrassment as we buy tampons, pads, a douche, or a cure for a yeast infection. In my mind, I feel they are thinking: Oh, she's on her period. Or oh, she needs to freshen up. Or oh, she stayed in a wet bathing suit for too long.

    That is the point, though, really. No one truly knows what another is thinking, and even if they are........who cares?

    Hmm..I suppose a teenager is more susceptible to the reaction of others... another interesting point to ponder......

  • TiredSoVeryTired

    Ooh, I disagree with the whole funding the kid thing, but otherwise great information.  What really needs to be done is a larger campaign aimed at the boys!  The truth is most women I've known to have abortions weren't worried about taking care of their baby as much as they were terrified of doing it alone because men walk out!  We need to do a hell of a lot better job of placing not just financial responsibilities on the men, but regular care taking responsibilities on men too!  When these babies are born to women who considered abortion a real option for them, they end up being the only parent physically and actually taking care of the child.  When baby-daddies start changing diapers and caring for their babies, abortion rates will drop.  But the focus is always on what women must do to not get pregnant, rather than what men must do after their girl finds out she is pregnant.

  • TiredSoVeryTired

    @agnophilo - @GodlessLiberal - Oh, please.  I've been buying tampons for over twenty years.  If as teenage girls, we must walk into a pharmacy and buy pads (announcing to all a very private and embarrassing thing as teenagers), so too can the boys be man enough to go buy condoms.  I don't agree with handing out condoms simply because I don't believe it teaches responsibility for your actions.  If you want to have sex, go buy your own condoms.  It's simple.  If you can't handle standing in line with some condoms, buy some tampons too and really confuse the checker (who has seen it all).  Hell, tell them it's for your parent's anniversary, buy them online with a visa giftcard, whatever... but realize that having sex comes with responsibilities, we've taken the responsibilities away from the boys.  

  • TiredSoVeryTired

    @Kellsbella - If my 15-year-old self could walk in and buy tampons, so can any teenage boy walk in and buy condoms. 

  • we_deny_everything

    It was a long time ago.  We saw a film in Personal Hygiene class.  Act 1: young guy goes out on the town with friends and lays a prostitute.  Act 2:  another night, the young guy goes out with his girlfriend and lays her.  Act 3:  girlfriend tells her mom there is something wrong "down there."  Omg she has the clap!

    I am not making this up.  It seems the only films available back then were the ones they made to train G.I.s going overseas.

  • Kellsbella
  • TiredSoVeryTired

    @we_deny_everything - I saw a film in the Navy.  It was husband and wife fight.  Husband storms out, goes to the bar and lays a random chic.  He says to the camera, "I don't participate in risky behavior, but because of that night I am HIV positive."  What the hell?  We were all like, duh, cheating on your wife with a random chic is the very definition of risky behavior.

  • we_deny_everything

    @TiredSoVeryTired - I learned a valuable lesson from the hygiene film.  I have never had an abortion.

  • TheSutraDude
  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)