Uncategorized

  • The Ten Commandments of Xanga Debate

    Debate happens constantly, all over Xanga, but probably nowhere more than it does here on my page. Most of my posts are meant to foster intelligent debate, or at least bring attention to important issues. I’ve been running debate sites on Xanga since 2004 (maybe a handful of you remember as Arguments From The Left), and so how to properly debate here has always been of interest to me.

    I was walking along a mountain top one day last year when the Xanga gods bestowed unto me ten rules (or commandments, if you will) for how to be an effective Xanga debater. I’ll admit that I don’t always follow these rules (I’m not perfect, although I’m damned close!), but I do try my best.

     

    1) Thou shalt treat people with the same amount of respect they give you, if not more.
    If someone respectfully presents a point you don’t agree with, as wrong as they might be you won’t convince anybody how right you are by shouting them down and calling them a knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing asshat.

    2) Thou shalt read the entire post/comment that you are responding to BEFORE you respond to it.
    I don’t care how salient your point about the progressive tax rate may be, if you’re responding to a comment that was actually about how cute puppies are it will absolutely fall on deaf ears.

    3) Thou shalt back up your point with facts.
    “That can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” – Christopher Hitchens
    “Tuna are just as smart as people.” – Some Xanga debater, probably.

    4) Thou shalt use spell check.
    You could have a Nobel Prize in chemistry, but I’m gonna have a very difficult time taking you seriously when you’re talking about “led piosonign in are ground water’s.”

    5) Thou shalt not resort to name-calling.
    Seriously, cut it out, asshole.

    6) Thou shalt not stereotype.
    When you say “all Christians do this” or “all atheists believe that”, all people who read your comment lose respect for you.

    7) Thou shalt back up statistics with sources.
    68% of all Xangans know not to trust uncited statistics.

    8) Thou shalt not invoke Godwin’s Law.
    Godwin’s Law states that any internet debate will eventually get to calling somebody Hitler. Remember: Obama isn’t Hitler. George W. Bush isn’t Hitler. Hitler was Hitler. That’s about it.

    9) Thou shalt not feed the trolls.
    I know, sometimes it’s hard to tell who is a troll and who is serious when the believe in castrating all Christians. This is due to something known as Poe’s Law, where pretend extremists online are indistinguishable from actual extremists without the use of a smiley face or the term “lol.” When in doubt, trust your fellow Xangans. When they’re in doubt, just ignore them.

    10) Thou shalt admit when thou hast been shown to be wrong.
    You’d want the other person to do this. If you claim that Reagan never cut taxes, and someone shows you definitive evidence that yes, he did, you should admit that you were in the wrong. Tied into this, you should accept the other person’s admittance with grace and tact. No matter how right you were, responding with “in your face!” instantly makes you wrong.

    Despite the sacrilege in even asking the question, are there any laws the Xanga gods left out?

  • Want to reduce the number of abortions? Here’s my plan:

    Step 1: Proper sex education. How many of you had a PROPER sexual education course? I know I did. I still have nightmares about the slideshow. If you had a proper course, you know what I’m talking about. The extreme closeups on ravaged genitalia.
    “What is that? Is that a hippo with gout?”
    “That’s gonorrhea.”
    “Oh. I’m never touching a woman. Ever.”
    Those slideshows always reminded me of what could happen if I had unprotected sex. Even ten years later those images are burned to the backs of my retinas. And for the record, a proper sex education still teaches that abstinence is the best way to prevent pregnancy and STDs. But it should not be the only thing taught.

    Studies show that in the parts of America teaching abstinence only education the average age of first sexual encounter was later and number of sexual partners was lower, but the STD rate stayed the same and pregnancy actually went up, because kids used oral or anal sex as an alternative, and when they had traditional sex it was much more likely to be unprotected.

    Expecting teenagers to just “say no to sex” is incredibly naive. This is when hormones are flowing and every single facet of society tells you to have sex… it’s fun and popular. So just saying “abstain” and washing your hands of it is not a solution. Teaching kids about condoms, the pill, and other options are what works. Kids that don’t get sex education don’t know that you can get STDs from oral sex, or that you can get pregnant even if you do “pull out.” So obviously their education is incomplete.

    Part of this sex education will be teaching that pregnancies are a purely biological function, not a horrible stigma upon whatever woman has it. My hypothesis is that part of the reason for getting an abortion is the fear of the shame of being an unwed teenage mother.


    Step 2: Access to contraceptives. All this teaching doesn’t do any good if they can’t get the things they need for safe sex. This seems fairly self-explanatory. Expecting kids not to have sex because they have no access to condoms is like expecting to reduce the number of fires by removing fire extinguishers.



    Step 3: Financial support for women who DO become pregnant. One of the determining factors in getting an abortion is “can I afford this baby?”
    If they get help with things like medical attention, maternity clothes, leave of absence from their job, a legitimate way to get affordable care for the child while the mother works her job… why, they might not get an abortion. Far too often the “pro-life” crowd seems to cease caring about the life once it is outside the womb.

    Now of course, there will be some concern over people abusing this, and saying “I’m pregnant, give me money.” There’s a really simple way around that. Give them funding in a way that can only be used towards legitimate enterprises. I obviously don’t know the most fool-proof method yet, but some thoughts I’ve had include:

    • Something like food stamps, but used only towards things like maternity clothes, cribs, diapers, etc.
    • “Pregnancy counselors” or something of the sort that you must go through to buy all these things. You must check in with them every so often for medical checkups and help planning and purchasing.
    • Medical checkups would be required for proof of pregnancy.

    This should be something both sides of the issue can get behind. It doesn’t impede on a woman’s right to choose, which will make pro-choice people happy, and it decreases the amount of abortions, which makes pro-lifers happy. No plan will ever make either side truly, 100% happy, but I truly think this is about as good as it can get. It pries too much into the social life of the prospective mother for liberals, and it’s too socially-conscious for conservatives. But progress often requires compromise, so figure out what’s more important to you. Liberals need to realize that government assistance requires some invasion to operate properly, and conservatives need to realize that “just say no” may be fine on a bumper sticker, but effective laws need more thought and money backing them.


  • Hey, Pass Me a Beer!

    I know you all expected me to post about the Supreme Court decision about Obamacare… but instead I’m going to post a video about something near and dear to my heart: beer.

  • Extinct

    This is (hopefully) the most depressing thing I’ll see all day:

  • Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex

    He’s faster than a speeding bullet. He’s more powerful than a locomotive. He’s able to leap tall buildings at a single bound. Why can’t he get a girl?

    At the ripe old age of thirty-one (*Superman first appeared in Action Comics, June 1938*), Kal-El (alias Superman, alias Clark Kent) is still unmarried. Almost certainly he is still a virgin. This is a serious matter. The species itself is in danger!

    An unwed Superman is a mobile Superman. Thus it has been alleged that those who chronicle the Man of Steel’s adventures are responsible for his condition. But the cartoonists are not to blame.

    Nor is Superman handicapped by psychological problems.

    Granted that the poor oaf is not entirely sane. How could he be? He is an orphan, a refugee, and an alien. His homeland no longer exists in any form, save for gigatons upon gigatons of dangerous, prettily colored rocks.

    As a child and young adult, Kal-El must have been hard put to find an adequate father-figure. What human could control his antisocial behavior? What human would dare try to punish him? His actual, highly social behavior during this period indicates an inhuman self-restraint.

    What wonder if Superman drifted gradually into schizophrenia? Torn between his human and kryptonian identities, he chose to be both,keeping his split personalities rigidly separate. A psychotic desperation is evident in his defense of his “secret identity.”

    But Superman’s sex problems are strictly physiological, and quite real.

    The purpose of this article is to point out some medical drawbacks to being a kryptonian among human beings, and to suggest possible solutions. The kryptonian humanoid must not be allowed to go the way of the pterodactyl and the passenger pigeon.


    I

    What turns on a kryptonian?

    Superman is an alien, an extraterrestrial. His humanoid frame is doubtless the result of parallel evolution, as the marsupials of Australia resemble their mammalian counterparts. A specific niche in the ecology calls for a certain shape, a certain size, certain capabilities, certain eating habits.

    Be not deceived by appearances. Superman is no relative to homo sapiens.

    What arouses Kal-El’s mating urge? Did kryptonian women carry some subtle mating cue at appropriate times of the year? Whatever it is,Lois Lane probably didn’t have it. We may speculate that she smells wrong, less like a kryptonian woman than like a terrestrial monkey. A mating between Superman and Lois Lane would feel like sodomy-and would be, of course, by church and common law.


    II

    Assume a mating between Superman and a human woman designated LL for convenience.

    Either Superman has gone completely schizo and believes himself to be Clark Kent; or he knows what he’s doing, but no longer gives a damn. Thirty-one years is a long time. For Superman it has been even longer. He has X-ray vision; he knows just what he’s missing. (*One should not think of Superman as a Peeping Tom. A biological ability must be used. As a child Superman may never have known that things had surfaces, until he learned to suppress his X-ray vision. If millions of people tend shamelessly to wear clothing with no lead in the weave, that is hardly Superman’s fault.*)

    The problem is this. Electroencephalograms taken of men and women during sexual intercourse show that orgasm resembles “a kind of pleasurable epileptic attack.” One loses control over one’s muscles.

    Superman has been known to leave his fingerprints in steel and in hardened concrete, accidentally. What would he do to the woman in his arms during what amounts to an epileptic fit?


    III

    Consider the driving urge between a man and a woman,the monomaniacal urge to achieve greater and greater penetration. Remember also that we are dealing with kryptonian muscles.

    Superman would literally crush LL’s body in his arms, while simultaneously ripping her open from crotch to sternum, gutting her like a trout.


    IV

    Lastly, he’d blow off the top of her head.

    Ejaculation of semen is entirely involuntary in the human male, and in all other forms of terrestrial life. It would be unreasonable to assume otherwise for a kryptonian. But with kryptonian muscles behind it, Kal-El’s semen would emerge with the muzzle velocity of a machine gun bullet. (*One can imagine that the Kent home in Smallville was riddled with holes during Superboy’s puberty. And why did Lana Lang never notice that?*)

    In view of the foregoing, normal sex is impossible between LL and Superman.

    Artificial insemination may give us better results.


    V

    First we must collect the semen. The globules will emerge at transsonic speeds. Superman must first ejaculate, then fly frantically after the stuff to catch it in a test tube. We assume that he is on the Moon, both for privacy and to prevent the semen from exploding into vapor on hitting the air at such speeds.

    He can catch the semen, of course, before it evaporates in vacuum. He’s faster than a speeding bullet.

    But can he keep it?

    All known forms of kryptonian life have superpowers. The same must hold true of living kryptonian sperm. We may reasonably assume that kryptonian sperm are vulnerable only to starvation and to green kryptonite; that they can travel with equal ease through water, air,vacuum, glass, brick, boiling steel, solid steel, liquid helium, or the core of a star; and that they are capable of translight velocities.

    What kind of a test tube will hold such beasties?

    Kryptonian sperm and their unusual powers will give us further trouble.For the moment we will assume (because we must) that they tend to stay in the seminal fluid, which tends to stay in a simple glass tube. Thus Superman and LL can perform artificial insemination.

    At least there will be another generation of kryptonians.

    Or will there?


    VI

    A ripened but unfertilized egg leaves LL’s ovary, begins its voyage down her Fallopian tube.

    Some time later, tens of millions of sperm, released from a test tube,begin their own voyage up LL’s Fallopian tube.

    The magic moment approaches…

    Can human breed with kryptonian? Do we even use the same genetic code?On the face of it, LL could more easily breed with an ear of corn than with Kal-El. But coincidence does happen. If the genes match…

    One sperm arrives before the others. It penetrates the egg, forms a lump on it’s surface, the cell wall now thickens to prevent other sperm from entering. Within the now-fertilized egg, changes take place…

    And ten million kryptonian sperm arrive slightly late.

    Were they human sperm, they would be out of luck. But these tiny blind things are more powerful than a locomotive. A thickened cell wall won’t stop them. They will *all* enter the egg, obliterating it entirely in an orgy of microscopic gang rape. So much for artificial insemination.

    But LL’s problems are just beginning.


    VII

    Within her body there are still tens of millions of frustrated kryptonian sperm. The single egg is now too diffuse to be a target. The sperm scatter.

    They scatter without regard to what is in their path. They leave curved channels, microscopically small. Presently all will have found their way to the open air.

    That leaves LL with several million microscopic perforations all leading deep into her abdomen. Most of the channels will intersect one or more loops of intestine.

    Peritonitis is inevitable. LL becomes desperately ill.

    Meanwhile, tens of millions of sperm swarm in the air over Metropolis.


    VIII

    This is more serious than it looks.

    Consider: these sperm are virtually indestructible. Within days or weeks they will die for lack of nourishment. Meanwhile they cannot be affected by heat, cold, vacuum, toxins, or anything short of green kryptonite. (*And other forms of kryptonite. For instance, there are chunks of red kryptonite that make giants of kryptonians. Imagine ten million earthworm size spermatozoa swarming over a Metropolis beach,diving to fertilize the beach balls… but I digress.*) There they are,minuscule but dangerous; for each has supernormal powers.

    Metropolis is shaken by tiny sonic booms. Wormholes, charred by meteoric heat, sprout magically in all kinds of things: plate glass,masonry, antique ceramics, electric mixers, wood, household pets, and citizens. Some of the sperm will crack light speed. The Metropolis night comes alive with a network of narrow, eerie blue lines of Cherenkov radiation.

    And women whom Superman has never met find themselves in a delicate condition.

    Consider: LL won’t get pregnant because there were too many of the blind mindless beasts. But whenever one sperm approaches an unfertilized human egg in its panic flight, it will attack.

    How close is close enough? A few centimeters? Are sperm attracted by chemical cues? It seems likely. Metropolis had a population of millions; and kryptonian sperm could travel a long and crooked path,billions of miles, before it gives up and dies.

    Several thousand blessed events seem not unlikely. (*If the pubescent Superboy plays with himself, we have the same problem over Smallville.*)

    Several thousand lawsuits would follow. Not that Superman can’t afford to pay. There’s a trick where you squeeze a lump of coal into its allotropic diamond form…


    IX

    The above analysis gives us part of the answer. In our experiment in artificial insemination, we must use a single sperm. This presents no difficulty. Superman may use his microscopic vision and a pair of tiny tweezers to pluck a sperm from the swarm.


    X

    In its eagerness the single sperm may crash through LL’s abdomen at transsonic speeds, wreaking havoc. Is there any way to slow it down?

    There is. We can expose it to gold kryptonite.

    Gold kryptonite, we remember, robs a kryptonian of all of his supernormal powers, permanently. Were we to expose Superman himself to gold kryptonite, we would solve all his sex problems, but he would be Clark Kent forever. We may regard this solution as somewhat drastic.

    But we can expose the test tube of seminal fluid to gold kryptonite, then use standard techniques for artificial insemination.

    By any of these methods we can get LL pregnant, without killing her. Are we out of the woods yet?


    XI

    Though exposed to gold kryptonite, the sperm still carries kryptonian genes. If these are recessive, then LL carries a developing human foetus. There will be no more Supermen; but at least we need not worry about the mother’s health.

    But if some or all of the kryptonian genes are dominant…

    Can the infant use his X-ray vision before birth? After all, with such a power he can probably see through his own closed eyelids. That would leave LL sterile. If the kid starts using heat vision, things get even worse.

    But when he starts to kick, it’s all over. He will kick his way out into open air, killing himself and his mother.


    XII

    Is there a solution?

    There are several. Each has drawbacks.

    We can make LL wear a kryptonite (*For our purposes, all forms of kryptonite are available in unlimited quantities. It has been estimated, from the startling tonnage of kryptonite fallen to Earth since the explosion of Krypton, that the planet must have outweighed our entire solar system. Doubtless the “planet” Krypton was a cooling black dwarf star, one of a binary pair, the other member being a red giant.*)belt around her waist. But too little kryptonite may allow the child to damage her, while too much may damage or kill the child. Intermediate amounts may do both! And there is no safe way to experiment.

    A better solution is to find a host-mother.

    We have not yet considered the existence of a Supergirl. (*She can’t mate with Superman because she’s his first cousin. And only a cad would suggest differently.*) She could carry the child without harm. But Supergirl has a secret identity, and her secret identity is no more married than Supergirl herself. If she turned up pregnant, she would probably be thrown out of school.

    A better solution may be to implant the growing foetus in Superman himself. There are places in a man’s abdomen where a foetus could draw adequate nourishment, growing as a parasite, and where it would not cause undue harm to surrounding organs. Presumably Clark Kent can take a leave of absence more easily than Supergirl’s schoolgirl alter ego.

    When the time comes, the child would be removed by Caesarian section. It would have to be removed early, but there would be no problem with incubators as long as it was fed. I leave the problem of cutting through Superman’s invulnerable skin as an exercise for the alert reader.

    The mind boggles at the image of a pregnant Superman cruising the skies of Metropolis. Batman would refuse to be seen with him; strange new jokes would circulate the prisons…and the race of Krypton would be safe at last.


    ©Larry Niven, 1971, Reprinted with permission

  • How Christian fundamentalists plan to teach genocide to schoolchildren

    I want to thank @ZombieMom_Speaks for bringing this to my attention. I’ve read through multiple articles on this subject, and no matter how I try I can’t do this subject justice more than this article, found in its original format here. If someone could find me an online form of the actual instruction manual, I might be able to do my own write up. But until then, let’s let someone else educate you on some severely disturbing things happening to our children:

    The Bible has thousands of passages that may serve as the basis for instruction and inspiration. Not all of them are appropriate in all circumstances.

    The story of Saul and the Amalekites is a case in point. It’s not a pretty story, and it is often used by people who don’t intend to do pretty things. In the book of 1 Samuel (15:3), God said to Saul:

    “Now go, attack the Amalekites, and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”

    Saul dutifully exterminated the women, the children, the babies and all of the men – but then he spared the king. He also saved some of the tastier looking calves and lambs. God was furious with him for his failure to finish the job.

    The story of the Amalekites has been used to justify genocide throughout the ages. According to Pennsylvania State University Professor Philip Jenkins, a contributing editor for the American Conservative, the Puritans used this passage when they wanted to get rid of the Native American tribes. Catholics used it against Protestants, Protestants against Catholics. “In Rwanda in 1994, Hutu preachers invoked King Saul’s memory to justify the total slaughter of their Tutsi neighbors,” writes Jenkins in his 2011 book, Laying Down the Sword: Why We Can’t Ignore the Bible’s Violent Verses (HarperCollins).

    This fall, more than 100,000 American public school children, ranging in age from four to 12, are scheduled to receive instruction in the lessons of Saul and the Amalekites in the comfort of their own public school classrooms. The instruction, which features in the second week of a weekly “Bible study” course, will come from the Good News Club, an after-school program sponsored by a group called the Child Evangelism Fellowship (CEF). The aim of the CEF is to convert young children to a fundamentalist form of the Christian faith and recruit their peers to the club.

    There are now over 3,200 clubs in public elementary schools, up more than sevenfold since the 2001 supreme court decision, Good News Club v Milford Central School, effectively required schools to include such clubs in their after-school programing.

    The CEF has been teaching the story of the Amalekites at least since 1973. In its earlier curriculum materials, CEF was euphemistic about the bloodshed, saying simply that “the Amalekites were completely defeated.” In the most recent version of the curriculum, however, the group is quite eager to drive the message home to its elementary school students. The first thing the curriculum makes clear is that if God gives instructions to kill a group of people, you must kill every last one:

    “You are to go and completely destroy the Amalekites (AM-uh-leck-ites) – people, animals, every living thing. Nothing shall be left.”

    “That was pretty clear, wasn’t it?” the manual tells the teachers to say to the kids.

    Even more important, the Good News Club wants the children to know, the Amalakites were targeted for destruction on account of their religion, or lack of it. The instruction manual reads:

    “The Amalekites had heard about Israel’s true and living God many years before, but they refused to believe in him. The Amalekites refused to believe in God and God had promised punishment.”

    The instruction manual goes on to champion obedience in all things. In fact, pretty much every lesson that the Good News Club gives involves reminding children that they must, at all costs, obey. If God tells you to kill nonbelievers, he really wants you to kill them all. No questions asked, no exceptions allowed.

    Asking if Saul would “pass the test” of obedience, the text points to Saul’s failure to annihilate every last Amalekite, posing the rhetorical question:

    “If you are asked to do something, how much of it do you need to do before you can say, ‘I did it!’?”

    “If only Saul had been willing to seek God for strength to obey!” the lesson concludes.

    A review question in the textbook seeks to drive the point home further:

    “How did King Saul only partly obey God when he attacked the Amalekites? (He did not completely destroy as God had commanded, he kept the king and some of the animals alive.)”

    The CEF and the legal advocacy groups that have been responsible for its tremendous success over the past ten years are determined to “Knock down all doors, all the barriers, to all 65,000 public elementary schools in America and take the Gospel to this open mission field now! Not later, now!” in the words of a keynote speaker at the CEF’s national convention in 2010. The CEF wants to operate in the public schools, rather than in churches, because they know that young children associate the public schools with authority and are unable to distinguish between activities that take place in a school and those that are sponsored by the school.

    In the majority opinion that opened the door to Good News Clubs, supreme court Justice Clarence Thomas reasoned that the activities of the CEF were not really religious, after all. He said that they could be characterized, for legal purposes, “as the teaching of morals and character development from a particular viewpoint”.

    As Justices Souter and Stevens pointed out in their dissents, however, the claim is preposterous: the CEF plainly aims to teach religious doctrines and conduct services of worship. Thomas’s claim is particularly ironic in view of the fact that the CEF makes quite clear its intent to teach that no amount of moral or ethical behavior (pdf) can spare a nonbeliever from an eternity in hell.

    Good News Clubs should not be in America’s public elementary schools. As I explain in my book, The Good News Club: The Christian Right’s Stealth Assault on America’s Children, the club exists mainly to give small children the false impression that their public school supports a particular creed. The clubs’ presence has produced a paradoxical entanglement of church and state that has ripped apart communities, degraded public education, and undermined religious freedom.

    The CEF’s new emphasis on the genocide of nonbelievers makes a bad situation worse. Exterminist rhetoric has been on the rise among some segments of the far right, including some religious groups. At what point do we start taking talk of genocide seriously? How would we feel about a nonreligious group that instructs its students that if they should ever receive an order to commit genocide, they should fulfill it to the letter?

    And finally, when does a religious group qualify as a “hate group”?